During the CM selection process, which statements are true?

During the CM selection process, which statements are true?

• A. The parties should have a clear understanding of the scope of CM services required and what form of CM agreement is proposed for use during the engagement.
• B. The owner should consider the cost of CM services only after the establishment of the technical requirements and after careful consideration of the CM's qualifications, related experience, and proposed staffing plan.
• C. The proposed CM agreements should clearly define the risks and authority assumed by the CM, as distinguished from those retained by the owner.
• D. All of the above

Answer: (D)

When selecting a Construction Manager, you need alignment on scope and how the CM will be contracted, careful timing of cost considerations, and a clear split of risks and decision authority between the CM and the owner. Establishing a clear understanding of the CM scope and the form of the CM agreement early prevents misinterpretation of deliverables and responsibilities, ensuring both parties share the same expectations about services and compensation. Considering the cost of CM services only after the technical requirements are set and after assessing the CM’s qualifications, related experience, and staffing plan helps you avoid chasing price before you know what the project actually needs and who is capable of delivering it. Finally, the CM agreement should precisely define the risks and the authority the CM carries versus what remains with the owner, which reduces ambiguity, protects the owner’s control, and clarifies accountability. When all of these elements are addressed, it reflects sound, comprehensive CM selection practices.

When selecting a Construction Manager, you need alignment on scope and how the CM will be contracted, careful timing of cost considerations, and a clear split of risks and decision authority between the CM and the owner. Establishing a clear understanding of the CM scope and the form of the CM agreement early prevents misinterpretation of deliverables and responsibilities, ensuring both parties share the same expectations about services and compensation. Considering the cost of CM services only after the technical requirements are set and after assessing the CM’s qualifications, related experience, and staffing plan helps you avoid chasing price before you know what the project actually needs and who is capable of delivering it. Finally, the CM agreement should precisely define the risks and the authority the CM carries versus what remains with the owner, which reduces ambiguity, protects the owner’s control, and clarifies accountability. When all of these elements are addressed, it reflects sound, comprehensive CM selection practices.