The basic contractual relationships between the CM and designer are essentially the same in the CMAA A-1 and AIA C132-2009 documents.

The basic contractual relationships between the CM and designer are essentially the same in the CMAA A-1 and AIA C132-2009 documents.

• A. The basic contractual relationships between the CM and designer are essentially the same in the CMAA A-1 and AIA C132-2009 documents.
• B. The CM and designer have opposite relationships in CMAA and AIA documents.
• C. CM and designer roles are entirely undefined in CMAA A-1.
• D. The CMAA A-1 document does not cover designer interactions.

Answer: (A)

In both CMAA A-1 and AIA C132-2009, the CM acts as the owner’s adviser and coordinator, not as a design professional or as a direct contract party to the designer. The owner holds separate contracts with the designer and with the CM, and the CM’s role is to facilitate communication, provide preconstruction services, review for constructability and cost, manage changes, and keep the project aligned with budget and schedule. This creates a consistent relationship framework between CM and designer: the CM supports the design process and coordinates efforts, while the architect remains responsible for the design under the owner’s contract. Therefore, the basic CM–designer contractual relationship is essentially the same in both documents. The other options conflict with this arrangement, as they imply opposite, undefined, or absent interactions between the CM and designer.

In both CMAA A-1 and AIA C132-2009, the CM acts as the owner’s adviser and coordinator, not as a design professional or as a direct contract party to the designer. The owner holds separate contracts with the designer and with the CM, and the CM’s role is to facilitate communication, provide preconstruction services, review for constructability and cost, manage changes, and keep the project aligned with budget and schedule. This creates a consistent relationship framework between CM and designer: the CM supports the design process and coordinates efforts, while the architect remains responsible for the design under the owner’s contract. Therefore, the basic CM–designer contractual relationship is essentially the same in both documents. The other options conflict with this arrangement, as they imply opposite, undefined, or absent interactions between the CM and designer.